![]() | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
History of the Movement in Massachusetts
Eighteenth Freedom Rally Sails into Memory! Hemp Activists Get Joint Jumping (Boston Herald) Video
Election of 2006: Legalization, Medical, Policy Questions keep winning big. In the 3rd Middlesex the
question on the ballot ran as follows: Shall the state senator from this district be
instructed to vote in favor of legislation that would allow seriously ill patients, with
their doctor's written recommendation, to possess and grow small amounts of marijuana for
their personal medical use?. (Towns with a presence in the 3rd Middlesex:
Weston, Bedford, Carlisle, Chelmsford, Concord, Lexington, Lincoln, Waltham, and Sudbury).
Rally17 goes down in history! Reform Sweeps! ---Can 400,000 Massachusetts Citizens be wrong? In the 2000, 2002, and 2004 elections eight cannabis reform
questions were placed before voters in four Senate and seventeen
Representative Districts. Results.
(Hint: before you write your Rep or Senator be sure to check to
see if the voters in his district have already voted your way.
If they have, don't be afraid to point this out.)
On Tuesday 3/7/2006, the Judiciary committee heard testimony on H. 862 or "An Act To Impose A Civil Fine For Possession of Marijuana". (H. 862 is the House version of S. 1151.) Our testimony here . [Note: 3 megs.] We had a great panel of witnesses and the Committee was surprisingly welcoming and hospitable. A report of this interesting afternoon is posted here. Take a look. On Wednesday 3/1/2006, the Joint Committee on Public Health referred H. 2742, an important piece of Medical Marijuana legislation, "to study,"* ie., to the dumpster. Among other provisions, H. 2742 would have established legal protection for seriously ill patients who use marijuana under the recommendation of their doctor and allowed DPH-certified patients to possess and/or cultivate marijuana for medical purposes. House Chairman Peter Koutoujian (D-Waltham) stated that the action was based on an opinion by the committee counsel that H.2742 violates federal law. According to attorney Steven Epstein, that advice "... reflects a clearly erroneous understanding of the Supreme Court's decision in Gonzales v. Raich and the principles of federalism established by the Constitution. "In Raich," Epstein continues, "the Court decided that the state of
California was free to permit the medical use of marijuana by its citizens even though the
federal Drug Enforcement Administration was free to continue to persecute California's
medical users. Massachusetts is as free as California." On Monday 2/13/2006, the State Mental Health and Substance Abuse Committee voted 6-1 to shift regulation of the possession of less than an ounce of marijuana from the criminal to the civil courts (where, for example, traffic fines are adjudicated). Under the terms of the measure in question S. 1151, such possession would earn a civil fine of $250. Currently possession of "any detectable amount" is a criminal offense, punishable by up to six months in jail and a $500 fine (for the first offense). The bill eliminates the authority of the police to handcuff a person over 18 years of age for possession of less than an ounce. The bill is the first reform measure to be acted on favorably by any organ of the legislature in many years. Medical Marijuana Passes in Rhode Island! Associated Press storyOther coverage Our own take Mass. Committee on Public Health hears
testimony on medical marijuana Nature Smiles on Sixteenth Freedom Rally No Opponents Appear in Opposition to Legalization War on drugs is a war on marijuana users Ballot victories pay off Criminal sanctions fail to control marijuana use Pro-legalization Testimony presented to Legislature Oct. 8,'03: Two dozen members of MassCann and marijuana policy reform activists from all over New England gathered in the shadow of Faneuil Hall Wednesday to protest the government's war on medical marijuana users. Carrying signs reading ... (More) (Yet More...) After a nail biting week ...
|